Interface

Between Heaven and Earth

Mystery XIV: Self-awareness, the Ego, & the Way Back

Don: In our discussion so far the message seems to be emerging that the way back to god through a true and faithful understanding of the god of our various religions may be a red herring; that the best way is in fact through a true and faithful understanding of our individual selves and of our need for god’s grace.

We discussed the story of the Samaritan woman whom Jesus met at a well and of whom he requested a drink of water. In those days, the cultural and religious divide between Jews and Samaritans was about what it is between today’s Israelis and Palestinians—pretty wide and contentious. There were also taboos about men interacting with women, as there still are in some religions today. One other unusual aspect of this story is that the woman was collecting water at about 2 pm—the hottest part of the day—which is not the norm even in today’s desert communities, which perform the laborious task of fetching water in the cool of the morning and/or of the evening. It suggests that the woman was not welcome at the well with her fellow villagers so had to use it when no-one else would be there—that she was some sort of outcast; perhaps because (as the story recounts) she was living with a man who was not her husband.

In short, Jesus was reaching across multiple barriers—racial, religious, gender, and moral—in talking to this woman. He did so in order to awaken her self-awareness, to give her a new spiritual understanding. In talking about thirst, they were talking about life and death in that place at that time. Today, we are so accustomed to water gushing out of nearby faucets on demand that we tend not to appreciate its critical vitality in the way that Jesus and his contemporaries, who had to dig deep wells just to find it, then haul it by hand up the well shaft and across the desert back to the village, would have appreciated it. In the story, therefore, it is important to recognize the great strength of the metaphor of water as a spiritual life-giving substance. Jesus was telling her (and through her, us) that he had something that was as essential for her spirit as water was essential for her body. And what he had was not just a bucket of spiritual water to bring temporary relief from drought and thirst, but rather a bottomless, inexhaustible well bringing permanent relief from spiritual drought and thirst.

But while we are aware of the state of our bodies, we often fail to be aware of the state of our souls. We know when we are thirsty for water, but we may not recognize when our spirit is dying for lack of its metaphorical counterpart.

David Foster Wallace, a writer, novelist, and philosopher who was not particularly religious, made an extraordinary and now quite famous commencement speech at Kenyon College in 2005.

The full speech is well worth reading, but the ending of his speech is especially relevant to our present discussion:

… in the day-to-day trenches of adult life, there is actually no such thing as atheism. There is no such thing as not worshiping. Everybody worships. The only choice we get is what to worship. And the compelling reason for maybe choosing some sort of god or spiritual-type thing to worship—be it JC or Allah, be it YHWH or the Wiccan Mother Goddess, or the Four Noble Truths, or some inviolable set of ethical principles—is that pretty much anything else you worship will eat you alive. If you worship money and things, if they are where you tap real meaning in life, then you will never have enough, never feel you have enough. It’s the truth. Worship your body and beauty and sexual allure and you will always feel ugly. And when time and age start showing, you will die a million deaths before they finally grieve you. On one level, we all know this stuff already. It’s been codified as myths, proverbs, clichés, epigrams, parables; the skeleton of every great story. The whole trick is keeping the truth up front in daily consciousness. [In other words: Self-awareness — DW]

Worship power, you will end up feeling weak and afraid, and you will need ever more power over others to numb you to your own fear. Worship your intellect, being seen as smart, you will end up feeling stupid, a fraud, always on the verge of being found out. But the insidious thing about these forms of worship is not that they’re evil or sinful, it’s that they’re unconscious. They are default settings.

They’re the kind of worship you just gradually slip into, day after day, getting more and more selective about what you see and how you measure value without ever being fully aware that that’s what you’re doing.

And the so-called real world will not discourage you from operating on your default settings, because the so-called real world of men and money and power hums merrily along in a pool of fear and anger and frustration and craving and worship of self. Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom all to be lords of our tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the centre of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talk about much in the great outside world of wanting and achieving…. The really important kind of freedom involves attention and awareness and discipline, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them over and over in myriad petty, unsexy ways every day.

That is real freedom. That is being educated, and understanding how to think. The alternative is unconsciousness, the default setting, the rat race, the constant gnawing sense of having had, and lost, some infinite thing.

I know that this stuff probably doesn’t sound fun and breezy or grandly inspirational the way a commencement speech is supposed to sound. What it is, as far as I can see, is the capital-T Truth, with a whole lot of rhetorical niceties stripped away. You are, of course, free to think of it whatever you wish. But please don’t just dismiss it as just some finger-wagging Dr. Laura sermon. None of this stuff is really about morality or religion or dogma or big fancy questions of life after death.

The capital-T Truth is about life BEFORE death.

It is about the real value of a real education, which has almost nothing to do with knowledge, and everything to do with simple awareness; awareness of what is so real and essential, so hidden in plain sight all around us, all the time, that we have to keep reminding ourselves over and over:

“This is water.”

“This is water.”

It is unimaginably hard to do this, to stay conscious and alive in the adult world day in and day out. Which means yet another grand cliché turns out to be true: your education really IS the job of a lifetime. And it commences: now.

I wish you way more than luck.

It has been suggested that confession of our sins is a key component of self-awareness.

Robin: There is a danger that self-awareness can degenerate into self-absorption, which brings no benefit to others.

Michael: Self-awareness is not taught in college. Where does it come from?

David: I don’t get Jesus’ contention that he delivers a bottomless well of spiritual water:

Everyone who drinks of this water [from the physical well] will thirst again; but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life.”

It seems to me our spiritual thirst needs just as much overt quenching as our physical thirst. The well won’t do that for us on its own. We still have to drop the bucket in and haul it up, and even before that, we have to feel thirsty.

Robin: That’s why we need daily communion with Jesus, otherwise we might fail to notice our thirst.

Charles: As I understand it, Jesus went to Samaria, and probably to the well and to the woman in question, by choice. There was a more direct route that would have avoided the desert, but he chose not to take it. We can assume he did so to present us with the lessons we are now discussing, but there is another possible reason: God is thirsty. After the Fall and until the End of the Age there is a mutual need and desire to reconcile God and Man, to become One again. We humans sometimes forget it, but god never does, and seems to go out of his way to maintain a relationship with us. In the Catholic church, the act of confession and penance (significantly, its formal name is the Sacrament of Reconciliation) is our way to reciprocate, to seek spiritual reconciliation, to repair our broken souls, to assuage our guilt, to confess that we are not what we could be. Jesus instituted this sacrament. He passed on this power of reconciliation—this power to forgive sins—to his apostles, who passed it on to the church. But the sacrament—the act of confession—is all about the sinner, not about the priest. It is about self-awareness, a self-examination of conscience, a self-admission of guilt and contrition and a plea for forgiveness. This seems to me to be the only way to a quieting of the troubled soul, a healing of the broken person, a quenching of the thirst, a fulfilling of a need. The Catholic confession is just a mechanism—but it works. At some point in life, I believe we are all the Woman at the Well. We are broken, and reach out for god—but even as we do so, god is reaching out to us, as if in a mirror. And at the interface, where the fingers touch, there is pure truth. The woman confesses her sin, recognizes her brokenness, becomes self-aware.

This concept of self-awareness is mightily powerful.

Incidentally, the Catholic sacrament of reconciliation is only offered after baptism. It started only after Jesus had risen and passed on his spirit to the apostles. I don’t mean to say that this Catholic sacrament is the only way to reconcile with god. I am sure it could occur spiritually within the individual, without any religious intervention: The essential elements are self-awareness, confession, and a plea for grace.

Robin: We become thirsty when something gets out of balance. Jesus says we will never lack balance—will never need an IV—if we drink sufficiently. We have to drink constantly.

Jay: The ego is a stumbling block to self-awareness. Jesus is saying that our physical wellbeing is not the issue; it is our spiritual wellbeing is the issue. Therefore our self-awareness has to focus on spiritual, not material, things. Confession and reconciliation allude to immaterial—they allude to lack of integrity, and so on.

Ben: I feel that I was more self-aware as a child than I am as an adult. Do we regress with age, but then start to recover it as we approach death?

Michael: Our default state is fear, which creates a need for worldly things such as money, power, and so on. Our default state is thus to be NOT self-aware. Jesus wants to get us out of our default state, and that is not easy.

Ben: That makes sense. A state of being not self-aware has no subject and therefore no object—no “other” to love. It takes a conscious act to leap from the non-self-aware state to the self-aware state.

Robin: Yes, the question is how to make our self-awareness generous and relate to others rather than purely self-centered.

Ben: Lying back and gazing at the night sky can bring an awareness of being a part of—one with—the universe. At those moments, there is no “other” because all are One. This Oneness—god, if you like—is not an object; it is a subject without an object. It is a Being.

Pat: I would say that we do not exactly regress in adulthood so much as we start to accumulate material junk and make compromising concessions that smother and divert our spirituality. Eventually, as Ben says, we start to recognize the junk and concessions for what they really and discard them. We start to recognize the essence and the value of just Being—of “Be Still, and Know that I Am God” (Psalms 46:10). That’s where we can still hear the still, small voice; after we have abandoned our own ego.

Michael: Can we reach a sustained sense of Being, of self-awareness?

David: The idea of the Catholic confession as I understand it is that you need to confess regularly, and that both confessor and confessant understand that the former’s instruction to go away and sin no more is not likely to be obeyed. And I agree, intuitively, that constant recourse to the well of self-awareness is necessary—that one bucket of spiritual water is not going to cut it. The “Inner Light” seems to me to be the same as the spiritual well Jesus promises, but the problem is that the light tends to go (almost) out if not tended—and we often fail or forget to tend it.

Ben: The notion of oscillation between self-awareness and god-awareness seems to me to be an essential element of life itself. Without it, there would be nothing to distinguish. Ego must have helped drive the woman to the well in the first place, but once she arrived, the ego was no longer needed. It had done its job.

Pat: Over the course of human history, the people regarded as most spiritual are the hermits who abjure social responsibility and contact to seek their own spirituality! Yet our faith calls us to leave the hermitage and find and succor others in need. I could not and would not want to live the life of a monk, but they are the ones who try hardest to abandon their ego and reach ultimate self-awareness.

Chris: The spiritual and worldly senses of self-awareness are separated by the ego. The former does not need it; the latter does. Love, caring, and grace are foreign to the ego. The shift to spiritual self-awareness, the oscillation between them, is a battle between the ego and… what?

Charles: Just as an aside: There is no requirement in the Catholic church to confess regularly, though we are expected to realize that we need it all the time, and it is therefore available all the time.

I regard the child as being the least self-aware state. The younger the child, the more its dependence on and trust in the parent. I think this is what Jesus meant when he called on us to become child-like again.

Self-awareness began in the Garden, physically when Adam and Eve became aware of their nakedness, and spiritually when they became aware of their separateness from the whole, from the Oneness. I hope we will explore this further. It seems to me a crucial aspect of the human spiritual journey, of the way back to god.

* * *

One response to “Mystery XIV: Self-awareness, the Ego, & the Way Back”

  1. David Ellis Avatar
    David Ellis

    I have long been a firm believer in the mind/body’s ability to heal itself, but I had never much thought about the obverse, so found this article interesting—the more so, when I stated thinking about self-awareness as well.

    Placebo and nocebo are perhaps considered by many people to be spiritual territory. To my mind, they are something that physics, not metaphysics, will explain, eventually; but I will concede that placebo/nocebo effects occur at the interface between physicality and spirituality, or the sacred and the mundane.

    Regardless of where the placebo/nocebo effect occurs, I believe self-awareness is the key to positively controlling the placebo effect or negatively controlling the nocebo effect. If to be self-aware is to be Enlightened, and if prayer/meditation is the path to Enlightenment, then prayer/meditation would seem also to be the path to self-awareness.

    I will post this on the blog.

    D.

    http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20150210-can-you-think-yourself-to-death
    BBC Future
    11 February 2015
    The contagious thought that could kill you

    by David Robson
    Beware the scaremongers. Like a witch doctor’s spell, their words might be spreading modern plagues.

    We have long known that expectations of a malady can be as dangerous as a virus. In the same way that voodoo shamans could harm their victims through the power of suggestion, priming someone to think they are ill can often produce the actual symptoms of a disease. Vomiting, dizziness, headaches, and even death, could be triggered through belief alone. It’s called the “nocebo effect”.

    But it is now becoming clear just how easily those dangerous beliefs can spread through gossip and hearsay – with potent effect. It may be the reason why certain houses seem cursed with illness, and why people living near wind turbines report puzzling outbreaks of dizziness, insomnia and vomiting. If you have ever felt “fluey” after a vaccination, believed your cell phone was giving you a headache, or suffered an inexplicable food allergy, you may have also fallen victim to a nocebo jinx. “The nocebo effect shows the brain’s power,” says Dimos Mitsikostas, from Athens Naval Hospital in Greece. “And we cannot fully explain it.”

    A killer joke

    Doctors have long known that beliefs can be deadly – as demonstrated by a rather nasty student prank that went horribly wrong. The 18th Century Viennese medic, Erich Menninger von Lerchenthal, describes how students at his medical school picked on a much-disliked assistant. Planning to teach him a lesson, they sprung upon him before announcing that he was about to be decapitated. Blindfolding him, they bowed his head onto the chopping block, before dropping a wet cloth on his neck. Convinced it was the kiss of a steel blade, the poor man “died on the spot”.

    While anecdotes like this abound, modern researchers had mostly focused on the mind’s ability to heal, not harm – the “placebo effect”, from the Latin for “I will please”. Every clinical trial now randomly assigns patients to either a real drug, or a placebo in the form of an inert pill. The patient doesn’t know which they are taking, and even those taking the inert drug tend to show some improvement – thanks to their faith in the treatment.

    Yet alongside the benefits, people taking placebos often report puzzling side effects – nausea, headaches, or pain – that are unlikely to come from an inert tablet. The problem is that people in a clinical trial are given exactly the same health warnings whether they are taking the real drug or the placebo – and somehow, the expectation of the symptoms can produce physical manifestations in some placebo takers. “It’s a consistent phenomenon, but medicine has never really dealt with it,” says Ted Kaptchuk at Harvard Medical School.

    Over the last 10 years, doctors have shown that this nocebo effect – Latin for “I will harm” – is very common. Reviewing the literature, Mitsikostas has so far documented strong nocebo effects in many treatments for headache, multiple sclerosis, and depression. In trials for Parkinson’s disease, as many as 65% report adverse events as a result of their placebo. “And around one out of 10 treated will drop out of a trial because of nocebo, which is pretty high,” he says.

    Although many of the side-effects are somewhat subjective – like nausea or pain – nocebo responses do occasionally show up as rashes and skin complaints, and they are sometimes detectable on physiological tests too. “It’s unbelievable – they are taking sugar pills and when you measure liver enzymes, they are elevated,” says Mitsikostas.

    And for those who think these side effects are somehow “deliberately” willed or imagined, measures of nerve activity following nocebo treatment have shown that the spinal cord begins responding to heightened pain before conscious deliberation would even be possible.

    Consider the near fatal case of “Mr A”, reported by doctor Roy Reeves in 2007. Mr A was suffering from depression when he consumed a whole bottle of pills. Regretting his decision, Mr A rushed to ER, and promptly collapsed at reception. It looked serious; his blood pressure had plummeted, and he was hyperventilating; he was immediately given intravenous fluids. Yet blood tests could find no trace of the drug in his system. Four hours later, another doctor arrived to inform Reeves that the man had been in the placebo arm of a drugs trial; he had “overdosed” on sugar tablets. Upon hearing the news, the relieved Mr A soon recovered.

    We can never know whether the nocebo effect would have actually killed Mr A, though Fabrizio Benedetti at the University of Turin Medical School thinks it is certainly possible. He has scanned subjects’ brains as they undergo nocebo suggestions, which seems to set off a chain of activation in the hypothalamus, and the pituitary and adrenal glands – areas that deal with extreme threats to our body. If your fear and belief were strong enough, the resulting cocktail of hormones could be deadly, he says.

    Sick rumours

    The thought that your doctor could inadvertently make you sicker is concerning enough. But more recently, it has become clear just how little is needed to spread the nocebo effect. Even just passing gossip and hearsay can prime your mind for illness with potent effect.

    Last year, for instance, Benedetti offered to take more than 100 students up the Italian Alps to an altitude of 3000m (9800ft). A few days beforehand, he had told just one of them about a possible consequence – that the thin air could bring on a migraine. By the day of the trip, he found that the gossip had spread to more than a quarter of the group – and those who had heard the rumour began to suffer the worst headaches. What’s more, a study of their saliva showed an exaggerated response to the low oxygen conditions, including a proliferation of the enzymes that are associated with altitude headache. “The brain biochemistry changed in the ‘socially infected’ individuals,” says Benedetti.

    In other words, harmful beliefs, that transmit illness, could be catching. “Negative expectations can be communicated to your friends, neighbours, and the like, and they spread very quickly, producing social nocebo effects in a large population of subjects,” says Benedetti. Indeed, another study found that simply seeing another patient suffering pain can make a treatment hurt more – suggesting nocebo could pass from person to person by silent observation. Even more worryingly, you might not need to be conscious of those thoughts to be affected; the nocebo can apparently be triggered by subliminal cues.

    History is full of mysterious outbreaks that might have arisen in this way. Most famous is the deadly dancing plague of 1518. Then, in the 1960s, there was the mysterious “June Bug” epidemic in an American textile factory, which brought about dizziness and vomiting, despite the fact that none of the poisonous insects thought to be responsible could ever be identified. The most chilling was the spate of mysterious deaths within the community of Hmong people who arrived in the US from southeast Asia in the 1980s – young men, with no existing illness, who began dying in their sleep after periods of nightmares and sleep paralysis; experts have speculated that it arose from a strong cultural belief in deadly night spirits. Often, fear of new technology seems to be responsible: in the late 19th Century, early telephone users reported giddiness and wracking pain after using the new contraption, for instance, while Scandinavian workers in the 1980s developed surprising rashes, apparently from their computer monitors.

    Today, the nocebo is perhaps most visible in such controversial disorders as “wind turbine syndrome” (sickness and insomnia from wind farms, most common in Canada) and “electro-sensitivity” – an allergic reaction to mobile phone signals and wi-fi. Some sufferers even resort to sleeping in metal cocoons to avoid the constant ringing in their ears. Yet dozens of experiments have shown that people are just as likely to report the same symptoms when they are exposed to a sham transmitter that doesn’t actually emit any electromagnetic waves.

    If work on the nocebo tells us anything, it is that we shouldn’t underestimate the distress of their condition. “I’ve got no doubt in my mind – people are genuinely experiencing physical symptoms,” says James Rubin at King’s College London. Even the former head of the World Health Organisation was affected: she banned cell phones in her office, because she thought that they gave her splitting headaches.

    Fears of electro-sensitivity are relatively rare, but there are many other ways a nocebo belief could have taken a hold of your health. Perhaps you suffer from a mysterious food intolerance, for instance. In England, 20% of people claim to be unable to stomach certain foods – yet hospital tests of the actual digestion suggest that only about a tenth of that number of people have a real problem. The nocebo may also explain why people apparently develop sickness after an inert vaccine, and it may shed light on the oft-discussed side-effects of the contraceptive pill – such as depression, headache, and breast pain– which scientific trails have mostly failed to confirm. Expectation of illness may also lie behind the sickness and eye-strain apparently created by 3D TVs.

    What can be done? It is notoriously difficult to neutralise long-held beliefs, but responsible media reporting would at least stem the spread of poisonous rumours. In 2013, Rubin found that simply showing a short video on electro-sensitivity was enough to trigger later symptoms – and the evidence seems to show that outbreaks of “wind turbine syndrome” follow local media reports. In other words, the health scares themselves are actually making people ill.

    How about doctors themselves? Rebecca Wells at the Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in North Carolina points out that it’s a major dilemma for modern medicine. Doctors are obliged to be honest about a drug’s side effects – they need to gain “informed consent” – but that is a fuzzy concept when the information itself could make someone sicker. “There is no hard and fast truth of what a medicine does,” Wells says. In the future, she thinks doctors may need to develop new procedures to decide which facts to divulge and the way they frame that information. Due care is crucial in each case – as Benedetti points out, the contagious nature of the nocebo means that a single person’s side-effects could soon spread to a much larger group.

    More positively, education itself may help sap the nocebo effect of its power. Mitsikostas, for instance, tries to explain to his patients that they have to be wary of their own expectations. “We have to make the patient understand that it’s an internal fear that we both have to try to fight,” he says.

    The mind-body connection, he says, is something that we can ill afford to ignore, despite our amazing new medical tools. “For millennia, medicine was basically placebo – by using expectation, magicians used the will to heal,” he says. “It is not enough to overcome disease – but it is indispensable.”

Leave a Reply