Interface

Between Heaven and Earth

Prayer 9: God’s Justice, part II

Note: When scripture is quoted, I usually copy from the New American Standard Bible (NASB) but in this discussion Don makes many biblical references apparently using the New International Version (NIV), so I have done likewise except where specifically noted.

Don: The promise of the parable of the importunate woman is that god’s justice will eventually come. There was some confusion over what god’s justice means.

Consider Isaiah 55:8-9:

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways My ways,” declares the Lord.
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are My ways higher than your ways
And My thoughts than your thoughts.”

The justice of god and what we would consider to be justice are light years apart. Here are some (of many) scriptural references to it; they suggest that justice is part and parcel of the very character and nature of god:

Leviticus 19:15: “‘Do not pervert justice; do not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly.

Deuteronomy 16:20: Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and possess the land the Lord your God is giving you.

Deuteronomy 27:19: “Cursed is anyone who withholds justice from the foreigner, the fatherless or the widow.”
Then all the people shall say, “Amen!”

Job 37:23: The Almighty is beyond our reach and exalted in power;
in his justice and great righteousness, he does not oppress.

Psalms 33:5: The Lord loves righteousness and justice;
the earth is full of his unfailing love.

Psalms 106:3: Blessed are those who act justly,
who always do what is right.

Psalms 140:12: I know that the Lord secures justice for the poor
and upholds the cause of the needy.

Proverbs 28:5: Evildoers do not understand what is right,
but those who seek the Lord understand it fully.

Proverbs 29:7: The righteous care about justice for the poor,
but the wicked have no such concern.

Isaiah 1:17: Learn to do right; seek justice.
Defend the oppressed.
Take up the cause of the fatherless;
plead the case of the widow.

Ezekiel 34:15-16: I will feed My flock and I will lead them to rest,” declares the Lord God. “I will seek the lost, bring back the scattered, bind up the broken and strengthen the sick; but the fat and the strong I will destroy. I will feed them with judgment.”

Micah 6:8: He has told you, O man, what is good;
And what does the Lord require of you
But to do justice, to love kindness,
And to walk humbly with your God?

Zachariah 7:9: “This is what the Lord Almighty said: ‘Administer true justice; show mercy and compassion to one another.’”

Matthew 12:18-21: “Here is my servant whom I have chosen,
the one I love, in whom I delight;
I will put my Spirit on him,
and he will proclaim justice to the nations.
He will not quarrel or cry out;
no one will hear his voice in the streets.
A bruised reed he will not break,
and a smoldering wick he will not snuff out,
till he has brought justice through to victory.
In his name the nations will put their hope.”

Matthew 23:23: “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You give a tenth of your spices—mint, dill and cumin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy and faithfulness. You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former.

These are just a handful of numerous scriptural references to god’s justice. Justice is evidently a central characteristic of god. Two similar English concepts: Righteousness/rightness/being right, whose origin is Anglo-Saxon, and Justification/justice/justness/judgment, whose origin is Greek. We use them differently in English. We tend to use righteousness in more of a divine context, and justice in a more secular context. In Hebrew and Greek, one word is used for both meanings.

In the old Catholic English translations of the bible, the word tends to be translated as justice, whereas in the Protestant translations it tends to be translated as righteousness. But essentially, in the scriptural context, justice and righteousness are synonymous. The Hebrew word—sadaq—is similar to an Arabic word—suduq—meaning truthfulness.

Treating these words and concepts as synonymous greatly simplifies the understanding of scripture.

Psalms 89:14: Righteousness and justice are the foundation of your throne;
love and faithfulness go before you.

The psalmist is linking these things as attributes of god; but not merely as peripheral attributes: They are foundational, the very core of god.

The word justice is also linked to justification: The idea that one can be made righteous by some kind of imputation of righteousness as a result of the grace of god.

In Romans 1:16-17, the concept that the gospel is synonymous with justice and righteousness:

For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, “But the righteous man shall live by faith.” [NASB]

Most translations say “…for the just shall live by faith.”

The commonly held notion of god’s justice as heavenly bliss or eternal hellfire is a perversion. This key passage reveals that the justice of god is in truth the gospel of Jesus. It is the ordering of things according to divine intention—according to god’s will. Hence “Thy will be done” in the Lord’s Prayer. The divine order of things is violated by things which god does not condone such as poverty and (especially) oppression. If justice is to be done, then this must be liberated.

The judgment scene in Matthew 25 is set over the issue of whether the judged took care of the poor and the needy. It’s as if god leaves the relief of this type of oppression to the community of faith. While god might at any time miraculously intervene to relieve oppression and institute justice, his preference, it would seem, is that the community of faith assume and accept that responsibility. So there is a sense in which the answer to prayer of those who are in need should be in the response of those who are close by—one’s community. Perhaps the existential answer to our prayer is that those of us who have a relationship with god, who hold the 0idea that the justice of god is important, have an obligation to be, as it were, god’s hands and god’s heart and to answer cries of oppression around them.

So we are back at our old topic of community. Could it be be that god’s glory and power are intended (god’s will) to be displayed not as miracles but through us in the form of worldly justice and the relief of oppression?

In John 9, Jesus was asked whose sin—his own or his parent’s—caused a certain blind man’s condition. Neither, was the answer; it was caused so that god’s glory could be made manifest.

Thus, it appears that the kingdoms of god, justice, and righteousness tend to have the same theme. In Matthew 6:33, Jesus puts kingdom and righteousness together:

“But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness,…”

The synonymity of the kingdom of god, justice, righteousness, mercy and so on suggest that together, they are what we should expect as the end product of prayer: As that which we will always receive when we ask, the door that will always be opened to our knock, the object that will always be found when we look.

So when Jesus says, as he often does in the parables, “The Kingdom of god is like this…,” we can also read it as “The justice of god is like this….” Understanding this perhaps will give us a fresh insight into what god’s justice is, what the product of prayer is, and what the gospel is ultimately all about. Can this understanding nourish and sustain our faith in god? Or is magic—miracles—still a necessary product of prayer?

Jay: We usually view justice in a punitive, negative light. But if we link justice with mercy and righteousness, it seems different. Romans 5:12-16 contrasts justice with judgment:

Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned—for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.

But the free gift is not like the transgression. For if by the transgression of the one the many died, much more did the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abound to the many. The gift is not like that which came through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment arose from one transgression resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the free gift arose from many transgressions resulting in justification. [NASB]

Paul is saying that justice is not about judgment; it is about the free gift of grace. When people—it’s especially common among children—say “That’s not fair!” they are appealing for justice. I think that justice delivered in the form of grace is indeed sufficient to sustain faith.

Harry: The justice talked about in Isaiah is not really the kind of justice Man wants. We have created our own selfish doctrine of justice but it cannot compare with that of a god whose ways are not our ways, whose thoughts are not our thoughts. We (myself included) are not prepared give anything like what we are supposed to give to relieve suffering and oppression. It’s really quite depressing.

Don: The grace with which prayer will always be answered indeed may not be what we have in mind, but if we could see the life-sustaining richness of that answer even when we are in the direst straits, perhaps it would open up a whole new dimension to prayer.

Kiran: Our discussion is affecting my own prayer! I am starting to doubt whether I even need to pray, since the spirit will pray for us anyway and god’s will will be done anyway. The only reason I can see now for prayer is so as to receive god’s grace, his justice. The cross is my judgment, my punishment, but it has been delivered and executed already—I don’t need to worry about it. This makes me feel that I am accepted by god, and that has set me free somehow.

Don: I am reluctant to tell someone not to pray for whatever they want. It doesn’t matter matter how trivial, frequent, and inconsequential one’s prayers are; the key is not to expect god to respond in any way other than by giving you his grace, justice, mercy, truthfulness, and so on. That response is unequivocally guaranteed, but is it good enough for us, or will we insist on miracles and magic?

Michael: We often pray for other people. Does that work? Might we be benefited by other people’s prayers for us, even though we might not realize it? Can we get god’s grace by this means? Believing that god answers prayer through other people adds a dimension to prayer.

Harry: It seems to me that the gift of prayer is so that we can center ourselves by establishing a relationship with the principles of god’s justice, mercy, righteousness and so on. But we are so far away from practicing the true concept of god’s justice, or even from discussing in church such questions as what the cross has to do with justice and what sins the cross cleanses us of? We don’t want to confront such questions. We’d rather take the easy route and ask for magic. Yet prayer that centers us to remind is of justice, mercy, and grace is not complex, and has real value.

Robin: Selfishly, we tend to want justice for ourselves and mercy for others. I think we should treat prayer as a conversation with a close friend or family member, and say and ask whatever we want. I think god wants that.

Kiran: I wanted a god of magic, and it colored the way I read the great prayers, such as David’s, in the bible. I failed to see the humility in them, and in comparison my own prayer was arrogant, lacking that humility. Our discussions have changed my view of prayer. Prayer that acknowledges god’s power to answer it according to his will, not the supplicant’s, is beautiful prayer. It affects me in a wonderful way.

Jason: I agree. Approaching god through prayer that says “I expect nothing; thy will be done” is liberating and productive: It gets you and me god’s grace. And not just you and me: Everyone else. It is perfectly equitable, and therefore perfectly just. Once we can get past the difficulty of accepting prayer in this light, then prayer is indeed beautiful, wonderful, liberating. It is the ultimate end point of prayer.

David: I am not sure I agree, as has been asserted today, that god wants our prayer. Prayer does not feature at all in Confucianism. Of course, that is not a religion per se but it has religious aspects to it—together with Daoism, it constitutes a deeply spiritual philosophy—and it substituted for religion in many ways in its heyday. However, the notion of justice features heavily in it: Confucius was consulted about justice all the time by the rulers of his day. The people of those days explicitly recognized the existence of a heaven and of divine justice in accepting the notion that over time, the unjust ruler risked losing “the mandate of heaven” and would fall from power. There is no suggestion in Chinese philosophy that people should pray to heaven to remove an unjust ruler. If it is to happen, it will do so of heaven’s will. Similarly, we will get god’s grace, whether we pray for it or not.

Michael: When we pray for others, perhaps it helps us realize what they need so that we ourselves are better able to help them.

Harry: Isaiah 55:11 seems to support the contention that we don’t need to pray:

So will My word be which goes forth from My mouth;
It will not return to Me empty,
Without accomplishing what I desire,
And without succeeding in the matter for which I sent it.

David: Mention has been made of “prayer life.” The question is whether this means a life of prayer—a life focused on prayer—or whether it means a life that is lived as a prayer—a prayer that is expressed through our behavior, through the way we live.

Don: To be continued.

 

* * *

 

3 responses to “Prayer 9: God’s Justice, part II”

  1. David Ellis Avatar
    David Ellis

    A few months ago we talked briefly about T.S. Eliot’s “Choruses from The Rock.” It contains the following lines, which seem to me can be taken to express beautifully and succinctly the notion, at the heart of our discussions on prayer, that we should enter into prayer with no expectation of an outcome (a dividend, a harvest):

    All men are ready to invest their money
    But most expect dividends.
    I say to you: Make perfect your will.
    I say: take no thought of the harvest,
    But only of proper sowing.

  2. Harry Thompkins Avatar
    Harry Thompkins

    Do we really know what prayer is for? For each of us there might be different answers. I find religious people of all faiths seem to think prayer is important. Even non – religious people pray. Why do we pray? Or for some of us: Why can’t we seem to pray?

    On a personal level I am in the category of no prayer. I stopped praying a long time ago, at a time when I was studying the history of the bible, including who wrote it and when it was written. My theology was also progressing towards nontraditional understandings at the same time. Prior to that point of change in my theological thinking I prayed prayers like: “Lord be with my family and friends; keep them safe and out of harm’s way;” “Help me with my career;” “Help me be a light for the gospel and bring people to Jesus;” “Help the truth of our message touch and change the hearts of people;” and “Help our church grow.”

    Mind you, I do not believe these were bad prayers. They reflected where I was at in my personal belief system at that time in my life.
    I stopped praying gradually. “Why?” is for a different discussion, but I can say prayers never seemed to go past the audible sound of my voice. Mentally, my understandings changed and so did my attitude towards prayer as I knew it. So there is no misunderstanding: My spiritual journey was getting richer and more fulfilling. I was not feeling lost or discouraged. I am grateful for our Sabbath morning study. I am finding that through our study, prayer may have a purpose again in my life, albeit for different reasons than I used to believe prayer was for. I think prayer is something that I can do with some consistency again. But first I want to state why I think people pray or find a religion they can believe in. I think it is important to first understand what leads us into believing in a religion.

    After watching a program on our late President John F. Kennedy I came to understand what really affects our psyche. The assassination of President Kennedy is still a vivid memory for me. I was not even an adult—I was just 6 years old. That terrible instant left me feeling insecure. What did it do to an adult? One who had a greater understanding of what it meant to be an American, who believed the United States was the most powerful and secure place on earth, and the president the most powerful man on earth, only to have a loner buy a mail order rifle and kill the POTUS on US soil! It was so unsettling that there has been one conspiracy theory after another. The reason behind our unsettled state, I think, is that we cannot come to grips with the fact that the universe God made for us has random events that affect us all, directly or indirectly, regardless of whether we are believers or not. There is no more special protection from random events for those who believe than there is for those who do not believe. We are all in the same boat. Random events affect us all equally.

    People’s main attraction to religion is the belief that if they believe or pray in a certain way, they will be protected against random events:

    • God will put a hedge around me and keep me and my family safe.
    • If I believe the right thing, God will not forget me and take me to heaven when I experience the worst event of my life: Death!
    • If I stay in prayer, God will show me special favor and help me in all that I do.
    • Bad things do not happen as much too faithful religious people who believe in the right truth as happen to the people who do not.

    You get the idea. We are afraid! People fear everything, so they want a belief system that takes their fear away. Or a system of prayer that keeps them connected to God again so they are not afraid and good fortune comes into their lives.

    Humans are not comfortable with the thought that random events can and will impact our lives. Maybe uncomfortable is the wrong word: We are horrified that random events can affect us. So what do we do?—What most selfish humans have done over the centuries: We build temples on earth to show that God has a home with us. We appease him by going to his home, so how could anything could possibly go wrong? His home is a temple where God can see our pious progress hear our songs of praise to make him take notice of our good works of piety, so we can say we have sacrificed for him and expect the return of the favor through a promise of security for the here and now, so our lives are not affected by random events such as death, murder, hunger, lost jobs, war, etc.

    What I got out of our class study on Prayer classes 7,8,9, and 10 not posted yet. You have to read them. It would take too long to explain them, as the class discovered. God’s Justice and righteousness is the same thing: It means being merciful and compassionate to those who need it. It means giving of yourself to help others who may need you for whatever reason. We all have different tools in our tool box to be used at different times for the benefit of people we love and care about, as well as people we do not know or love. For me, this is how I see God’s Kingdom effects that can subdue the random events that terrorize us all.

    I can pray or reflect easily on these things. And I can see how prayer on these subjects can change lives: Not by mouthing the words in some dark corner, but by doing these things of Grace when the opportunity comes our way.

    Blessings

  3. David Ellis Avatar
    David Ellis

    The Pope on Prayer, sort-of…

    …at any rate, I take many of Pope Francis’ remarks in this passage from his recent “Apostolic Exhortation” to be relevant to our discussion on prayer. One can substitute “prayer” (either the supplication or the supplicant) for “missionary” and “evangelization,” it seems to me.

    I have to admit, I am deeply impressed by this man. Here is the passage he wrote:

    Personal encounter with the saving love of Jesus

    264. The primary reason for evangelizing is the love of Jesus which we have received, the experience of salvation which urges us to ever greater love of him. What kind of love would not feel the need to speak of the beloved, to point him out, to make him known? If we do not feel an intense desire to share this love, we need to pray insistently that he will once more touch our hearts. We need to implore his grace daily, asking him to open our cold hearts and shake up our lukewarm and superficial existence. Standing before him with open hearts, letting him look at us, we see that gaze of love which Nathaniel glimpsed on the day when Jesus said to him: “I saw you under the fig tree” (Jn 1:48). How good it is to stand before a crucifix, or on our knees before the Blessed Sacrament, and simply to be in his presence! How much good it does us when he once more touches our lives and impels us to share his new life! What then happens is that “we speak of what we have seen and heard” (1 Jn 1:3). The best incentive for sharing the Gospel comes from contemplating it with love, lingering over its pages and reading it with the heart. If we approach it in this way, its beauty will amaze and constantly excite us. But if this is to come about, we need to recover a contemplative spirit which can help us to realize ever anew that we have been entrusted with a treasure which makes us more human and helps us to lead a new life. There is nothing more precious which we can give to others.

    265. Jesus’ whole life, his way of dealing with the poor, his actions, his integrity, his simple daily acts of generosity, and finally his complete self-giving, is precious and reveals the mystery of his divine life. Whenever we encounter this anew, we become convinced that it is exactly what others need, even though they may not recognize it: “What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you” (Acts 17:23). Sometimes we lose our enthusiasm for mission because we forget that the Gospel responds to our deepest needs, since we were created for what the Gospel offers us: friendship with Jesus and love of our brothers and sisters. If we succeed in expressing adequately and with beauty the essential content of the Gospel, surely this message will speak to the deepest yearnings of people’s hearts: “The missionary is convinced that, through the working of the Spirit, there already exists in individuals and peoples an expectation, even if an unconscious one, of knowing the truth about God, about man, and about how we are to be set free from sin and death. The missionary’s enthusiasm in proclaiming Christ comes from the conviction that he is responding to that expectation”.[208] Enthusiasm for evangelization is based on this conviction. We have a treasure of life and love which cannot deceive, and a message which cannot mislead or disappoint. It penetrates to the depths of our hearts, sustaining and ennobling us. It is a truth which is never out of date because it reaches that part of us which nothing else can reach. Our infinite sadness can only be cured by an infinite love.

    266. But this conviction has to be sustained by our own constantly renewed experience of savouring Christ’s friendship and his message. It is impossible to persevere in a fervent evangelization unless we are convinced from personal experience that it is not the same thing to have known Jesus as not to have known him, not the same thing to walk with him as to walk blindly, not the same thing to hear his word as not to know it, and not the same thing to contemplate him, to worship him, to find our peace in him, as not to. It is not the same thing to try to build the world with his Gospel as to try to do so by our own lights. We know well that with Jesus life becomes richer and that with him it is easier to find meaning in everything. This is why we evangelize. A true missionary, who never ceases to be a disciple, knows that Jesus walks with him, speaks to him, breathes with him, works with him. He senses Jesus alive with him in the midst of the missionary enterprise. Unless we see him present at the heart of our missionary commitment, our enthusiasm soon wanes and we are no longer sure of what it is that we are handing on; we lack vigour and passion. A person who is not convinced, enthusiastic, certain and in love, will convince nobody.

    267. In union with Jesus, we seek what he seeks and we love what he loves. In the end, what we are seeking is the glory of the Father; we live and act “for the praise of his glorious grace” (Eph 1:6). If we wish to commit ourselves fully and perseveringly, we need to leave behind every other motivation. This is our definitive, deepest and greatest motivation, the ultimate reason and meaning behind all we do: the glory of the Father which Jesus sought at every moment of his life. As the Son, he rejoices eternally to be “close to the Father’s heart” (Jn 1:18). If we are missionaries, it is primarily because Jesus told us that “by this my Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit” (Jn 15:8). Beyond all our own preferences and interests, our knowledge and motivations, we evangelize for the greater glory of the Father who loves us.

Leave a Reply